Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181224
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 06:28
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 247
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 963
89% 724 Pts
64-Core 2,658
178% 2,658 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$693
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 485
Reflection 507
Parallax 606
127% 533 fps
MRender 271
Gravity 546
Splatting 297
142% 371 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 140%
Great: 146%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$140
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 274 201 224 208 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 465
Write 443
Mixed 352
SusWrite 264
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 36.4
118% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 96.5
DQ Write 94.8
DQ Mixed 96.4
72% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 133%
Asmedia AS2115 120GB
37GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 61 17 93 10 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 317
Write 188
Mixed 178
SusWrite 53.4
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 10.1
48% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 81.4
DQ Write 97.7
DQ Mixed 68.1
57% 82.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 60%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 128 127 129 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 127
Write 128
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 128
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 87%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
329GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 58 56 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 51.2
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 57.3
40% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 51%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
146GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42% Average
Read 67.9
Write 43
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 78.3
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-8GTZB F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-8GTZB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
161% Outstanding
MC Read 66.7
MC Write 64.5
MC Mixed 58.1
180% 63.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 29.7
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 161%
Great: 166%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 3,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $1,520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $335Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback