HP Compaq 6510b (GU734UC#ABA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP Compaq 6510b (GU734UC#ABA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30C0
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 06:23
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Duo T7100-$90
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.9% Very poor
SC Int 46.3
SC Float 22.4
SC Mixed 30.2
26% 33 Pts
QC Int 86
QC Float 40.3
QC Mixed 54.7
14% 60.3 Pts
MC Int 87.9
MC Float 32.5
MC Mixed 55.2
9% 58.5 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 166 72 73 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.2% Below average
Read 200
Write 175
Mixed 176
SusWrite 122
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 17
54% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 106
80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $724SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback