| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | HP 810-300ng (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2AF3 |
| Memory | 23 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140912 |
| Uptime | 1.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 12 '19 at 04:21 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.2%
Good
|
63% 107 Pts
|
42% 341 Pts
|
24% 389 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290-$399
HP(103C 6516) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 841 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.5%
Average
|
40% 53.8 fps
|
44% 52.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 328 247 291 285 254 MB/s
|
75.5%
Very good
|
70% 311 MB/s
|
99% 34.8 MB/s
|
126% 209 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 199 197 195 200 199 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
121% 166 MB/s
|
148% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
54.5%
Above average
|
55% 19.3 GB/s
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
47% 85.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 810-300ng Builds (Compare 2 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 810-300ng
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 1x |
| Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $254 |