Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_X570ZD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_X570ZD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570ZD
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 20:53
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 216
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 557
61% 482 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 11D1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.7.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 31.2
27% 29.8 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 33
Splatting 23
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1969 991 818 816 816 817 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2032
Write 2011
Mixed 1518
SusWrite 1,038
370% 1,650 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 81.5
264% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 727
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 693
521% 695 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 258%
Great: 355%
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
109GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 418 415 424 423 426 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 476
Write 404
Mixed 390
SusWrite 418
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 25.2
110% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 43.3
68% 126 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 85%
SDXC Card 64GB
60GB free, PID 6366, samsung evo sd
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 33.3
Write 19
Mixed 23
SusWrite 20.4
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.3
283% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 27.3
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 23.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_X570ZD Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_X570ZD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback