MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '19 at 18:37
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 72.7 1-Core 119 2-Core 212 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 681 67% 550 Pts	64-Core 1,130 70% 1,130 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 119 Parallax 99.2 90% 110 fps	MRender 99.1 Gravity 101 Splatting 105 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 780GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 332 457 456 407 420 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 456 Mixed 431 SusWrite 414 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 89.6 4K Mixed 49.9 165% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 299 245% 349 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 125%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 26GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.7 4.8 4.2 4.8 4.9 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	6.5% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 10.5 Mixed 13 SusWrite 6.2 15% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.2 71% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.5% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 26GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 1.3 Mixed 1.2 1% 1.25 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1 48% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.7 4.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	5.49% Terrible	Read 21 Write 5 Mixed 10 SusWrite 5.8 12% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.3 63% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.49% Great: 9%
hp v165g 8GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID 5307 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.5 4.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	5.74% Terrible	Read 21.3 Write 3.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.7 9% 8.48 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 5.74% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D34AEEAK.K8FB 2x8GB 546 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85.3% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 27.9 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 25.1 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 95.4 42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	430x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	208x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	185x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	99x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	76x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	66x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	83x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	75x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $608

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)