Lenovo 2325ZUQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 2325ZUQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2325ZUQ
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 17:55
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 147
57% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 214
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 3
4% 4.35 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.26
4% 5.01 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LADi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 165 160 117 160 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 342
Write 180
Mixed 221
SusWrite 153
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 29
103% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 127
123% 197 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback