Packard imedia S3210

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 19%
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemPackard imedia S3210  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard WMCP78M
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20091106
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 17:28
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Athlon LE-1660
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Memory 43.9
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 47.5
31% 46.2 Pts
4-Core 46.8
8-Core 46.9
6% 46.8 Pts
64-Core 22
2% 22 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9200
Acer(1025 0153) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 311.6
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.2
0% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 0.3
0% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 0%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$16
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 60 69 73 62 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 12
Write 52.6
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 61.2
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.2
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 2.4
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical imedia S3210 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3210

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback