Asus X99-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-S  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 10:19
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5820K-$303
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
1-Core 128
2-Core 246
88% 187 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 829
85% 668 Pts
64-Core 1,032
69% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$799
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 90.3
Reflection 94.8
Parallax 98
24% 94.4 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 61.4
22% 76.1 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 146%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 782 598 574 498 387 367 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,333
Write 1,101
Mixed 716
SusWrite 534
205% 921 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 39.8
170% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 851
DQ Write 684
DQ Mixed 740
561% 758 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 171%
Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
50GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 258 214 146 147 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 471
Mixed 392
SusWrite 227
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 45.5
170% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 135%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$300
124GB free
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 447 448 333 282 282 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 459
Mixed 388
SusWrite 374
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 32.2
128% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 337
252% 336 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
219GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 74.5
Write 72.6
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 106
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$83
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 2801 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 41
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 23.4
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-S Builds (Compare 826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $594
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $335Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback