Hp-pavilion AV010AA-ABA p6212f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion AV010AA-ABA p6212f  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090724
Uptime26 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 05:11
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 59.8
36% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 62.4
8-Core 68.9
9% 65.7 Pts
64-Core 68.6
4% 68.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 80 83 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 92.2
Write 78.5
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 80
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 26.5
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 29.9
37% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.7
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback