Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 176 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 380 42% 331 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0494) 512MB CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 369.9 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 1.22 2% 2.19 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.64 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PB22-JS3 FDE 2.5" 128GB 813 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBM9MD1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 38 46 43 38 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 192 Write 42.7 Mixed 100 SusWrite 40.5 21% 94 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 7.4 35% 9.9 MB/s	DQ Read 16.4 DQ Write 7.4 DQ Mixed 9.4 8% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
M471B1G73BH0-YK0 01BA 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.4 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 15.3 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	715x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	298x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	96x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	54x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	41x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 268 samples	39x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16