PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 5810 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150414 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Jul 10 '19 at 14:56 |
Run Duration | 88 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 412.16
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron_M550_2.5"_7mm_512GB 512GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DL06
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,240x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 956x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 408x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 414x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 386x |
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples | 287x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $80 |