Packard dot s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemPackard dot s  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJE01_CT
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 03:56
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Atom N2600
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.73% Terrible
1-Core 9.9
2-Core 17.3
7% 13.6 Pts
4-Core 28.8
8-Core 31.8
4% 30.3 Pts
64-Core 25.9
2% 25.9 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$28
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 55 60 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 39.4
Write 41.5
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 56
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 48%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
2GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2 2.5 2.3 2.7 2.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Read 11.1
Write 1
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 2.4
4% 4.08 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown GU672203EP0200 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR3 666 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
9.62% Terrible
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 0.1
3% 1 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.62%
Great: 12%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical dot s Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Packard dot s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Terrible Total price: $120
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $159Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $384Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback