Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X470-PRO (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '19 at 23:54
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 227 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 836 77% 645 Pts	64-Core 1225 76% 1225 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.3% Average	Lighting 57.7 Reflection 63.8 Parallax 56 47% 59.2 fps	MRender 69.4 Gravity 57 Splatting 52.2 48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,114 Write 719 Mixed 1,182 293% 1,338 MB/s	4K Read 51.8 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 67.4 222% 75.5 MB/s	DQ Read 805 DQ Write 627 DQ Mixed 782 567% 738 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 278GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 451 448 458 432 396 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 468 Mixed 448 SusWrite 438 105% 467 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 99.1 4K Mixed 54.6 179% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 297 244% 349 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 180GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 273 273 273 274 273 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 306 Mixed 347 SusWrite 294 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 98 4K Mixed 54.2 186% 65.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 235 214% 326 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 56GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 131 117 125 122 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 157 Write 115 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 123 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 112%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 91 91 91 93 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 72.7 Write 110 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 91.5 65% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.4 224% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3000C15-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.9% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 24.9 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 24 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 98 41% 98 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,949x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	436x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	403x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	285x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	283x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	247x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	285x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	227x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	213x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	278x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	231x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $635

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)