HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z440 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 212B
Memory	22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150402
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '19 at 22:38
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 151 60% 99.7 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 681 61% 515 Pts	64-Core 863 53% 863 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 368.39 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Lighting 22.1 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 19.3 18% 19.4 fps	MRender 23.9 Gravity 18.1 Splatting 16.3 16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 50 72 64 65 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 74.1 Write 68.8 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 66.2 49% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 121GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 111 98 101 110 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 119 Write 118 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 104 66% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 32GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	65.6% Good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 22.2 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 15.4 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,239x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	1,036x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	861x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	740x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	144x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	129x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	184x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	177x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16