Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '19 at 03:26
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	57%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 191 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 727 66% 554 Pts	64-Core 1,288 80% 1,288 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 8670) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 124 Parallax 128 110% 129 fps	MRender 176 Gravity 131 Splatting 102 108% 136 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 32 24 20 28 22 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.4% Poor	Read 117 Write 226 Mixed 124 SusWrite 30.7 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 5.3 62% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 15.9 DQ Write 97.4 DQ Mixed 0.1 17% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 86%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 238GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 123 122 123 122 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 123 Write 111 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 122 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 87%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174 8,506 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 68GB free Firmware: CCA3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 77 76 79 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 56.5 Mixed 39 SusWrite 77.2 42% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 73%
SAMSUNG HM320II 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 73GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.2% Poor	Read 54 Write 42.2 Mixed 38 SusWrite 63.2 67% 49.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 83% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 27%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB 1,804 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 40GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 52 52 51 51 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 72.2 Write 65 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 51.5 78% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 57%
Imation Apollo UX 500GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 185GB free, PID fc88 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 30 34 34 34 34 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 31 Write 19.3 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 28.4 36% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 5,109 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1.5TB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 121 123 126 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 119 Write 110 Mixed 18 SusWrite 124 121% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.2% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 25.6 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 21.1 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,405x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	540x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	533x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	227x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	207x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	171x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	245x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16