Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z370M AORUS Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '19 at 17:05
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 80.5 1-Core 136 2-Core 271 88% 162 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 805 76% 632 Pts	64-Core 1,093 68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3752) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.8% Average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 54.8 Parallax 44.1 39% 48.8 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 47.2 Splatting 61.6 48% 58.4 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G37R5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 182 154 157 106 119 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 406 Write 367 Mixed 295 SusWrite 173 70% 310 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 72.9 4K Mixed 22.6 106% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 187 163% 243 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 765GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 113 115 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 106 Write 107 Mixed 59 SusWrite 114 71% 96.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 101 106 93 72 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 84.3 Write 132 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 98.3 71% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.7 212% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	39.4% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 11.6 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 12.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	23x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	19x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $331

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16