Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 46.7 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 97.6 38% 64.9 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 184 26% 189 Pts	64-Core 185 11% 185 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 1194) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	3.19% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 3.22 3% 3.49 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 3.27 Splatting 5 4% 4.28 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.19% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 115 126 126 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 364 Write 129 Mixed 121 SusWrite 123 40% 184 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 10.9 54% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 47.4 76% 149 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 2x2GB 2,546 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	109x
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	53x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	8x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	72x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	45x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	29x

SSD
RBUSNS8180S3128GI1 128GBKingstonBench 61%, 1,245 samples	13x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 4,820 samples	6x
CV3-8D128 128GBLiteonBench 68%, 3,328 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16