Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '19 at 15:11
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 660 5,902 User benchmarks, average bench 49% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 71.7 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 139 58% 97.7 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 202 26% 197 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 55%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: JPFOA3GH SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 32 36 35 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 16 Write 21.3 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 33.4 15% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F 38GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 1024, 1024, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 11 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	56x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16