Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	117.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150610
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '19 at 12:16
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 766 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 93.3 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 206 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 590 62% 500 Pts	64-Core 1766 109% 1766 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6391) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 172 Reflection 187 Parallax 185 140% 181 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 170 Splatting 122 112% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 868GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 417 421 404 404 415 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 462 Mixed 450 SusWrite 412 102% 454 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 39.1 126% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 392 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 333 259% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 858GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1758 1938 1658 1535 1527 1552 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,466 Write 2,173 Mixed 1,866 SusWrite 1,661 458% 2,041 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 54.2 187% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 636 DQ Write 406 DQ Mixed 558 406% 533 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 410%
Plextor M6S 256GB-$166 1,660 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 57GB free Firmware: 1.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 380 351 370 371 382 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 464 Write 400 Mixed 295 SusWrite 371 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 25.3 91% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 132 156% 270 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 104%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$52 4,260 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 769GB free Firmware: 01.01K04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 127 127 127 127 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 140 Write 138 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 126 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 87GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 138 133 137 139 138 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 126 Write 93.7 Mixed 64.8 SusWrite 136 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 96%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 64GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 96 99 98 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 104 Write 96.5 Mixed 93 SusWrite 96.1 72% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 67%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 210GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 83 80 79 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 120 Write 80 Mixed 67 SusWrite 83.1 64% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 96%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 8GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 116 Write 14.8 Mixed 9.3 38% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 44% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK 8x16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 50.1 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 40.6 124% 43.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8.3 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $379

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16