Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 11:45
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 96.4
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 168
72% 116 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 511
55% 426 Pts
64-Core 627
42% 627 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,300
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 461
Reflection 532
Parallax 803
121% 599 fps
MRender 550
Gravity 666
Splatting 328
188% 515 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 184%
Great: 200%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GB-$106
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 132 133 136 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.1% Above average
Read 242
Write 192
Mixed 200
SusWrite 134
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 26
94% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 95.5
DQ Mixed 29.6
52% 105 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 87%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$70
220GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 138 139 143 144 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.6% Good
Read 260
Write 248
Mixed 247
SusWrite 141
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 38.7
127% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 131%
Kingston A400 120GB-$25
13GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 258
Write 246
Mixed 209
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 20.4
90% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 124
109% 161 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 81%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$120
48GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 134 104 49 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.5% Good
Read 259
Write 249
Mixed 236
SusWrite 101
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 38.1
125% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 177
139% 192 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 125%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$235
57GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 267 275 309 361 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 694
Write 642
Mixed 508
SusWrite 306
120% 538 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 36.8
122% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 385
253% 293 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 221%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 22.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 52.4
76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $751
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback