Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '19 at 10:31
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63% Good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 51.3 2-Core 102 54% 81.7 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 203 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 3510) 1.2GB CLim: 845 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Lighting 28.3 Reflection 43.3 Parallax 31.7 23% 34.4 fps	MRender 40.7 Gravity 23.5 Splatting 29.4 25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 133 136 20 98 92 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.2% Below average	Read 253 Write 86.2 Mixed 76.1 SusWrite 98.7 28% 129 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 10.5 44% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 9.6 DQ Write 15.4 DQ Mixed 12.1 9% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24 4,798 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 76GB free Firmware: 3.43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 54 54 54 54 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 53.6 Write 12.7 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 53.5 28% 38.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-199.A00LF 2x4GB 869 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 667 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.6% Below average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 13.8 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 10.7 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	25x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	6x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	4x
F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 5 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $241

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16