Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 615e 128 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 35.2 2-Core 63 38% 56 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 143 17% 130 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA 6222) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.42 Parallax 0.59 2% 1.77 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 1.87 2% 2.19 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109 10,807 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2201000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 93.9 Write 138 Mixed 107 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 5.6 43% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 18.6 DQ Write 59.6 DQ Mixed 8.3 15% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 71%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 228GB free Firmware: VT100-33 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 61 64 65 68 68 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	37% Below average	Read 63.1 Write 70.5 Mixed 44.7 SusWrite 65.6 45% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	20x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	18x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $345

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16