Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 87.6 1-Core 41.7 2-Core 75.4 47% 68.2 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 214 21% 171 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M 4,542 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 1521) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 0.81 2% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 1.96 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB 4,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT05L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 130 126 131 131 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.5% Below average	Read 182 Write 130 Mixed 109 SusWrite 128 31% 137 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 12.5 46% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 50.3 62% 110 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	228x
Quadro FX 1800MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,209 samples	64x
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples	45x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16