Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X530FN
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '19 at 17:25
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	97%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 73 1-Core 58.5 2-Core 6 38% 45.8 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 34.6 26% 152 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0 29,453 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 1C0E) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9875 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Lighting 21.9 Reflection 14.6 Parallax 17.6 18% 18 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 18 Splatting 20.1 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB 2,914 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 110 111 106 110 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 356 Write 329 Mixed 262 SusWrite 114 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 11.4 42% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 272 211% 289 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 93%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 138 133 125 134 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 132 Write 120 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 132 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 228% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1P24HC4R1-BUYS 1x4GB 295 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.8% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 11.1 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 0.8 5% 1.8 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	160x
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	160x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	237x
MX150-0NvidiaBench 14%, 29,453 samples	85x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	90x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GBBench 79%, 14,424 samples	21x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	12x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	116x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	23x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16