Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_F705QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_F705QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X705QA
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '19 at 11:34
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.7% Below average
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 114
47% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 209
29% 212 Pts
64-Core 214
14% 214 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 1911) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.40.16.04
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 33.7
2% 18.3 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 26
Splatting 12.6
6% 15.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 112 112 113 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
70% Good
Read 456
Write 160
Mixed 280
SusWrite 116
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 22.8
114% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 212
169% 236 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70%
Great: 76%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 146 148 149 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 143
Write 135
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 145
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.6
253% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 81%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
7GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.4 7.4 9.6 9.7 6.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 7.1
9% 8.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_F705QA Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QA_F705QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $219
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $618SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback