PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD4 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120221 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Jul 06 '19 at 04:29 |
Run Duration | 217 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 260X-$120
Gigabyte(1458 2271) 2GB
CLim: 1188 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
|
24%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 231 229 230 229 228 MB/s
|
71.7%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
233GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 186 186 188 189 189 MB/s
|
72%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
84GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 230 230 228 228 239 MB/s
|
76.2%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
395GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 188 187 189 189 190 MB/s
|
73.4%
Very good
|
|||
57.9%
Above average
|
||||
54.2%
Above average
|
||||
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
6GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.6 2.5 3.4 3 3 MB/s
|
6.26%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
59.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 107x |
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 60x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 25x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 14x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $516 |