Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '19 at 12:30
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Memory 95.3 1-Core 132 2-Core 260 91% 162 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 744 78% 628 Pts	64-Core 750 46% 750 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB; sapphire puise radeon rx 580 8gb OC CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.3 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Lighting 69.5 Reflection 70.7 Parallax 85.6 57% 75.3 fps	MRender 71.2 Gravity 69.3 Splatting 57 53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000L2 256GB 2,256 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5L0QBXV7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 293 294 295 300 299 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	147% Outstanding	Read 1,181 Write 307 Mixed 300 SusWrite 297 114% 521 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 35.7 178% 70.3 MB/s	DQ Read 983 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 415 367% 569 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 153%
SanDisk X400 256GB-$29 2,279 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 69GB free Firmware: X4140000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 202 216 187 184 190 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 475 Write 259 Mixed 190 SusWrite 197 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 22.7 91% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 176 160% 245 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 99%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB 10,272 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 435GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 108 110 111 110 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 55.7 Write 26.1 Mixed 44.6 SusWrite 106 43% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD 2x8GB 3,030 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 24 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 26.4 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 56.2 71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	284x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	243x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	203x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	133x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $557

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16