PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 176B |
Memory | 21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20161007 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 05 '19 at 11:14 |
Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 745 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
|
6.16%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
789GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 373 365 376 382 369 MB/s
|
91.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
237GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 74 74 73 74 MB/s
|
32.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 99U5428-018.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples | 227x |
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples | 197x |
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 170x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples | 492x |
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples | 296x |
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples | 37x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $100 |