Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '19 at 10:35
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 92.3 1-Core 111 2-Core 222 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 559 63% 496 Pts	64-Core 568 35% 568 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,618 Write 4,906 Mixed 5,173 1,167% 5,232 MB/s	4K Read 358 4K Write 217 4K Mixed 243 970% 273 MB/s	DQ Read 853 DQ Write 593 DQ Mixed 687 523% 711 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
SSD 1TB 9,059 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 64GB free Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 244 243 216 160 85 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.9% Below average	Read 223 Write 101 Mixed 85.1 SusWrite 198 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 14.1 55% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 23.6 DQ Write 26.5 DQ Mixed 24.3 18% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 4x4GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.2% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 20.8 63% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 13.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

RAM
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	18x
36KSF2G72PZ-1 1x16GBMicronBench 28%, 138 samples	14x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	12x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $92

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16