Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89 20,692 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 104 2-Core 198 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 475 51% 408 Pts	64-Core 536 33% 536 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69 25,452 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 410GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 1.6 29 34 2.2 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 445 Write 309 Mixed 158 SusWrite 45.5 53% 239 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 4.4 43% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 5.5 5.8 5.9 5.8 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	4.62% Terrible	Read 13.7 Write 6.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 5.9 9% 7.83 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 32% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 4.62% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 3,072 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 18.6 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	309x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	268x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	237x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $581

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16