Asus H110M-C/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C/BR (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180507
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '19 at 00:56
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 205 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 741 59% 519 Pts	64-Core 768 48% 768 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 2081) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 162 Reflection 159 Parallax 170 132% 163 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 143 Splatting 104 114% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_FCCT256MX100SSD1 256GB 280 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 402 Write 328 Mixed 305 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 98.1 4K Mixed 37.2 139% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 136 134% 210 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 98%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 198GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 144 159 154 153 152 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 372 Write 434 Mixed 330 SusWrite 173 74% 328 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 35.6 128% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 171 159% 242 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 100%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB 23,667 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 54GB free Firmware: CA14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 55 59 60 57 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 4 Write 26.3 Mixed 8 SusWrite 56 17% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMUA5090KB78HAF2133 1x8GB 1,060 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 10 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 7.4 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C/BR Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C/BR

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	127x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	74x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	68x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	38x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	21x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16