Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer C1_MB
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181219
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '19 at 00:51
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	99%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 123 2-Core 234 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 427 53% 404 Pts	64-Core 605 37% 605 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 2183) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 139 Parallax 147 119% 144 fps	MRender 155 Gravity 141 Splatting 106 107% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 134%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6912 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.98% Terrible	Lighting 7.03 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 7.38 6% 8.33 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 6.63 Splatting 14.7 9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.98% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 530 537 522 512 521 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 1,689 Write 1,798 Mixed 1,222 SusWrite 554 295% 1,315 MB/s	4K Read 55.3 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 70 231% 78 MB/s	DQ Read 1,128 DQ Write 915 DQ Mixed 825 671% 956 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 296%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	79.6% Very good	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 22.5 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 25.1 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,060x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,068x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,446x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	398x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,754x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16