| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 66.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140122 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 04 '19 at 22:05 |
| Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 77% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
54.3%
Above average
|
56% 88.2 Pts
|
23% 180 Pts
|
13% 205 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
66.8%
Good
|
71% 74.9 fps
|
58% 70.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 77 86 81 81 80 MB/s
|
30.1%
Below average
|
30% 137 MB/s
|
44% 11.7 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3320413CS 320GB
139GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 88 87 87 86 MB/s
|
48.5%
Average
|
54% 73.7 MB/s
|
130% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
11GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 8.5 19 12 12 13 MB/s
|
6.59%
Terrible
|
16% 13.4 MB/s
|
14% 0.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
46.4%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
38% 13.1 GB/s
|
49% 81.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,813 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 222x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 175x |
| Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 143x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 207x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 108x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 100x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $548 |