Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '19 at 19:38
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 185
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 518
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.6% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 66.6
64% 73.8 fps
MRender 77.1
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 76.7
62% 75.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 187 170 169 213 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 442
Mixed 338
SusWrite 196
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 40.4
152% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 182
166% 254 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 130 143 138 142 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 153
Write 153
Mixed 96.5
SusWrite 140
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
285GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 111 119 118 122 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 115
Write 120
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 119
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 109%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
876GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 80 85 85 87 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 86.3
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
678GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 123 130 125 132 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 140
Write 136
Mixed 18
SusWrite 129
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 108%
Disk drive 1TB
587GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 60 64 63 63 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 63
Write 63.5
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 62.8
69% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $364
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback