Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190327
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '19 at 19:28
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 208 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 502 54% 431 Pts	64-Core 493 30% 493 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200 4,005 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 1140) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Lighting 15.7 Reflection 13 Parallax 13.7 13% 14.1 fps	MRender 19.1 Gravity 15.3 Splatting 13.6 13% 16 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 346GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1525 1741 1896 1927 1827 1881 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,150 Write 1,979 Mixed 1,246 SusWrite 1,799 403% 1,793 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 59.4 198% 69.1 MB/s	DQ Read 643 DQ Write 437 DQ Mixed 600 432% 560 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 393%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 101GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,200 Write 2,074 Mixed 1,399 420% 1,891 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 63.9 210% 73.7 MB/s	DQ Read 741 DQ Write 496 DQ Mixed 681 491% 639 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SF4721G8CKHH6DFSDS 2x8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.9% Good	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 21.6 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 18.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,239x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	954x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	408x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	414x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	385x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	286x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	347x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	208x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16