Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	67.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	19.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '19 at 15:00
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 93 2-Core 182 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 636 59% 493 Pts	64-Core 1,002 62% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4991) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.8% Good	Lighting 86.5 Reflection 88.5 Parallax 81 70% 85.3 fps	MRender 77.4 Gravity 78.7 Splatting 74 62% 76.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 87%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 387 Write 413 Mixed 291 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 70.8 4K Mixed 34.5 128% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 365 275% 366 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB 5,677 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 142GB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 107 Write 133 Mixed 28.2 65% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 100% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 127GB free Firmware: CC34 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 86.5 Write 75.5 Mixed 46.7 52% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 888GB free Firmware: CC25 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 133 Write 101 Mixed 63.8 74% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS722516VLSA80 165GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 85GB free Firmware: V34OA6MA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 52.5 Write 48.8 Mixed 29.5 32% 43.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 32%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0915 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 112 Write 146 Mixed 72.5 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.6 162% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 312GB free Firmware: CC32 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 110 Write 126 Mixed 31.2 65% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.5 190% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 75%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB 1,657 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 515GB free, PID 3008 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 37.5 Write 39 Mixed 28 44% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 20%
SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 37GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 20.5 Write 9.7 Mixed 4.5 12% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 41%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 26GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 41.3 Write 23.7 Mixed 26.5 36% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 4 261% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB 503 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	68% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 25.2 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 21.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 93 43% 93 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,404x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	539x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	532x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	226x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	206x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	171x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	244x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16