Panasonic CF-S9LWE8DS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.01GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemPanasonic CF-S9LWE8DS  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFS9-3
Memory3.9 GB free of 8.00781 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101026
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 04 '19 at 02:40
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5 M 560-$80
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
1-Core 25.1
2-Core 51.4
18% 38.2 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 131
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 42.2
3% 42.2 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.9
1% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.5
1% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$86
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 252 240 241 259 243 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 124%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 2TB
25GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.9% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 17
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 14.5
13% 17 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.9%
Great: 105%
Multi Flash Reader 8GB
3GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 2.2
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 1.6
3% 2.12 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 9%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$14
29GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.6 2.3 2.3 0.9 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 4.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 2.5
10% 8.85 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.9
146% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 48GB
800, 800, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 40960 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical CF-S9LWE8DS Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Panasonic CF-S9LWE8DS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback