Panasonic CF-S9LWE8DS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.01GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPanasonic CF-S9LWE8DS  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFS9-3
Memory3.9 GB free of 8.00781 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101026
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 04 '19 at 02:40
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5 M 560-$80
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 25.1
2-Core 51.4
29% 42.9 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 131
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 42.2
3% 42.2 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.48% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.9
0% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.5
0% 2.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.48%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$85
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 252 240 241 259 243 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 124%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 2TB
25GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.9% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 17
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 14.5
13% 17 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.9%
Great: 102%
Multi Flash Reader 8GB
3GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.7 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 2.2
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 1.6
3% 2.12 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 10%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
29GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.6 2.3 2.3 0.9 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 4.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 2.5
10% 8.85 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.9
146% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 48GB
800, 800, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 40960 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $315Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback