Asus TUF Gaming FX705DY_FX705DY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705DY_FX705DY  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705DY
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '19 at 19:34
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
68.4% Good
1-Core 106
2-Core 205
73% 155 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 613
62% 491 Pts
64-Core 582
39% 582 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Radeont RX 560X
Asus(1043 1EAE) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 18.41.28.04
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 81.7
Reflection 77.7
Parallax 118
22% 92.4 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 75
Splatting 77
21% 71.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 22%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 240 136 141 140 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 614
Write 263
Mixed 191
SusWrite 160
67% 307 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 32.4
103% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 464
DQ Mixed 332
263% 360 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
460GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 113 113 114 111 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
50% Average
Read 62.5
Write 117
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 111
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.5
171% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50%
Great: 72%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
227GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 122 123 124 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69% Good
Read 157
Write 104
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 123
151% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.8
245% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 28.1
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 24.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DY_FX705DY Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DY_FX705DY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback