Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz 3,782 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Memory 46.7 1-Core 23 2-Core 40 25% 36.6 Pts	4-Core 45.6 8-Core 45.5 6% 45.5 Pts	64-Core 44.2 3% 44.2 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 55 56 50 51 52 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 64.8 Write 72.9 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 51.3 41% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 452GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 56 57 51 53 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 114 Write 108 Mixed 56 SusWrite 52.5 61% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$123 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 125 126 126 123 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 76.4 Write 126 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 122 70% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.6 204% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB 0h DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.64% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 0.8 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.64% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16