Lenovo 20EQS1LV1J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20EQS1LV1J  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS1LV1J
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 02 '19 at 19:34
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 211
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 559
57% 463 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 6.78
6% 10.1 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 13.9
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L7 256GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT25L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 190 165 142 132 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 466
Write 219
Mixed 287
SusWrite 168
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 43.4
147% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 317
240% 324 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.2
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 23.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback