Asus P5KPL-VM

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5KPL-VM (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '19 at 19:12
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4700-$150 1,169 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Memory 98.3 1-Core 33.4 2-Core 59.4 47% 63.7 Pts	4-Core 37.4 8-Core 56.8 6% 47.1 Pts	64-Core 59.7 4% 59.7 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 32.7 Parallax 38.4 32% 36.9 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 37.3 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY4 64GB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 16 79 82 79 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 145 Write 92.2 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 61 18% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 14 43% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 16 DQ Write 30.4 DQ Mixed 8.2 10% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 61%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 500GB free Firmware: AX001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 19 81 82 81 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 13.8 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 65 30% 41.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 28% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 57%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 695GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 143 161 161 156 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 155 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 152 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 44.4 90% 44.4 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KPL-VM Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-VM

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	5x
Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples	4x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	4x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	44x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	4x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16