Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 100% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	35.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190116
Uptime	15.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '19 at 13:33
Run Duration	305 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Memory 80.8 1-Core 156 2-Core 296 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 951 90% 745 Pts	64-Core 1,149 71% 1,149 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% EVGA(3842 2172) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	107% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 129 Parallax 145 110% 136 fps	MRender 176 Gravity 127 Splatting 103 107% 135 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 282GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1067 858 851 846 829 828 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	288% Outstanding	Read 2,543 Write 2,295 Mixed 1,802 SusWrite 880 420% 1,880 MB/s	4K Read 58 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 80.2 264% 92.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,194 DQ Write 1047 DQ Mixed 1,120 840% 1,120 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 331GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8,360 Write 7535 Mixed 7,664 1,752% 7,853 MB/s	4K Read 538 4K Write 274 4K Mixed 352 1,411% 388 MB/s	DQ Read 1,417 DQ Write 1,051 DQ Mixed 1,088 853% 1,185 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47 10,943 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 638GB free Firmware: GKAOA70F SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 67 66 64 67 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 72.7 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 66.6 45% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 46%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 193GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 47 46 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 75.2 Write 75.5 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 47.1 50% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 142 143 139 137 140 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 90.7 Write 132 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 140 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 90%
WD My Book 1140 4TB 1,831 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 40GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 103 109 107 106 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	34% Below average	Read 37 Write 65 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 107 81% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 50%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 3GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 14 14 11 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 41.7 Write 39.5 Mixed 30 SusWrite 15 41% 31.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 92%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 65 77 56 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 6.7 Write 13.5 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 66.1 36% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 62%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 7TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 41 26 35 36 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.8% Terrible	Read 9 Write 13.2 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 33.2 23% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 9.8% Great: 92%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 66 40 55 58 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 18.5 Write 19 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 52.4 37% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 11% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB 1,517 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3500 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	79% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 25.1 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 32.8 SC Mixed 25.8 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $396

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,859x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,608x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	556x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,302x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	650x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	640x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	565x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	254x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,339

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16