PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20111017 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 02 '19 at 10:53 |
Run Duration | 190 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
75.3%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
115%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
562GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 120 123 132 122 135 MB/s
|
65.5%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 112 108 115 116 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$65
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 108 107 108 MB/s
|
70.6%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
635GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 85 87 90 90 MB/s
|
47.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST8000DM0004-1ZC11G 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 215 216 215 215 213 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 156x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 120x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 116x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 73x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 49x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 46x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $222 |