Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190412
Uptime	9 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '19 at 06:49
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	61%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 118 2-Core 234 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 402 54% 402 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 04C2) CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	51% Above average	Lighting 64.3 Reflection 65.4 Parallax 86.5 52% 72.1 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 62.1 Splatting 53 48% 60 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
VICKY-240GB 240GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1001A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 45 46 37 60 48 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.6% Below average	Read 450 Write 395 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 94 53% 241 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 13.6 4K Mixed 1.6 37% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 11.7 DQ Mixed 44.6 43% 73 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 38%
Seagate ST2000NP0011 2TB 671 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1TB free Firmware: PP05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 77 73 71 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 79.2 Write 62.5 Mixed 28 SusWrite 68.5 43% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 1x8GB 7,164 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9.2 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 9.8 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	652x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	205x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	169x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	127x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	114x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	111x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	65x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	95x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $544

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16