PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3128-A1 |
Memory | 60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180627 |
Uptime | 1.9 Days |
Run Date | Jun 30 '19 at 19:03 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
67.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
|
59.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$36
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 2.3 76 106 116 142 MB/s
|
44.4%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
308GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1848 1004 788 792 793 800 MB/s
|
203%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1G73BH0- 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 71x |
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 7x |
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 15x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 11x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |