Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151224
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '19 at 17:04
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 9,821 User benchmarks, average bench 46% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 72.4 1-Core 66.4 2-Core 122 53% 86.9 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 205 27% 205 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	4.04% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 5.77 Parallax 12.8 3% 7.58 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 11 Splatting 5.43 5% 6.58 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.04% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNS128GCSP 128GB 179 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: TA4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 190 181 197 179 186 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 305 Write 246 Mixed 256 SusWrite 186 56% 248 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 77.3 4K Mixed 26.6 111% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 191 149% 206 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 96%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2TB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 125 124 125 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 122 Write 123 Mixed 59 SusWrite 124 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 68%
Mass Storage Device 32GB 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 27GB free, PID 125d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 17.3 Write 15.7 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 17.5 23% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.8 145% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A 1x8GB 766 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3HP Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

CPU
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	24x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	17x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	28x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $204

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16