Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 EVO (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '19 at 17:03
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 92.1 2-Core 188 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 471 51% 405 Pts	64-Core 471 29% 471 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Asus(1043 3006) 3GB CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.11.5 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Lighting 52.1 Reflection 34.8 Parallax 69.2 42% 52.1 fps	MRender 33 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 43.2 35% 42.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SiImage 160GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 295 Write 104 Mixed 156 40% 185 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 25.8 85% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 165 139% 208 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 78%
Kingston HyperX 240GB-$65 502 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 164GB free Firmware: 320A SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 210 219 217 216 214 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 388 Write 272 Mixed 275 SusWrite 210 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 32.2 108% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 249 194% 267 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 978GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 113 115 116 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 114 Write 110 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 115 73% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 4,160 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	48.7% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 16.8 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	236x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	125x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	79x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	38x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	23x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	22x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16