Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '19 at 12:11
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0-$1,335 868 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 38.9 1-Core 52.3 2-Core 79.5 34% 56.9 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 213 21% 173 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 79%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB 6,044 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0629A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1105 964 251 125 155 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 1,299 Write 1,042 Mixed 911 SusWrite 454 207% 927 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 55.6 4K Mixed 33 124% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 73.5 117% 227 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 234%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5273DH0- 4x4GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46.6% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 21 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.4 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

RAM
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	18x
36KSF2G72PZ-1 1x16GBMicronBench 28%, 138 samples	14x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	12x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $92

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16