| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 9.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus CG8350 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK CG8350 |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120405 |
| Uptime | 6.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 30 '19 at 10:08 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | TWN-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.3%
Very good
|
67% 113 Pts
|
43% 319 Pts
|
20% 320 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 838C) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 354.45
|
9.77%
Terrible
|
9% 11.1 fps
|
12% 14 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 75 81 73 81 MB/s
|
52.3%
Above average
|
56% 77.8 MB/s
|
121% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 3TB
18GB free, PID 01f7
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 18 18 MB/s
|
14.7%
Very poor
|
32% 24.6 MB/s
|
94% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2TB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 18 18 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
32% 24.7 MB/s
|
91% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
41.7%
Average
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
37% 12.9 GB/s
|
57% 70.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CG8350 Builds (Compare 103 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus CG8350
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 61x |
| Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 11x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 14x |
| GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 13x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $414 |