Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160315
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '19 at 09:48
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6402P 15,913 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 183 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 380 48% 363 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8572) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.81% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 4.31 4% 4.4 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 3.83 Splatting 6.09 4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.81% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 418 Write 399 Mixed 354 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 57.6 187% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 350 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 162GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 150 151 152 151 149 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 146 Write 138 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 150 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 86%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB 13,827 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 312GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 123 122 122 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 119 Write 122 Mixed 95 SusWrite 122 156% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 46,470 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.4% Very good	MC Read 25 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 24.9 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 18.6 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,919 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	378x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	251x
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	274x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	175x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	159x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	104x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	71x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	55x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	87x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	59x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $207

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16